Ashay Nigam

Product Designer

Logo

Early success hid the reason we couldn’t scale.

I led V1 & V2 - strong early adoption, followed by a plateau.

The product worked for power users. It failed new users.

This gap slowed growth.

New account creation dropped 11% in one quarter.

+ Growth required lowering the barrier to first meaningful action.

What changed in V3

Background

Agriculture Tech software that enables sales teams to guide farmers at scale

Narrow decision windows

Weather & disease uncertainty

Field-level variability

Financial stakes and Crop loss

User

One sales representative

manages 50+ farmers making decisions across 30,000+ acres.

This tool enables earlier action.

Reducing crop loss by up to 30%.

V3 removed the barrier to first meaningful action.

Same data. Earlier access.

+14% Adoption growth after the previous plateau (in one quarter)

Driven by earlier access to decision-making signals.

+ This required restructuring how the system exposed value.

The strategic shift behind V3

The problem didn’t arrive fully formed.

Strong engagement in V1 and V2 created pressure to expand the tool to more users.

Business ask was to make this tool a magnet for new accounts.

But engagement had already plateaued.

+ Business was pushing growth without fixing activation.

How I reframed the problem

I traced what was limiting growth

Talked to power users.

Because business usually followed them. They liked the tool and wanted deeper views and more data.

Checked analytics when interviews didn’t explain the plateau.

V1 and V2 drove engagement, but first-time users showed a high drop-off rate.

Talked beyond power users.

For new users, on opening the tool, nothing felt decision-provoking, so they didn’t go deeper.

New users didn’t find a reason to act.

At year-end planning, the problem became specific enough to prioritize.

The product worked for power users. New users needed clearer value upfront.

Cost

Weak early activation in first-time users

Roadmap investment landing too late

Success metric

7-day return rate (first-time users)

+ Design-led clarity turned planning into prioritization.

From insights to decisions

Design influence shifted the roadmap sequence

Year-end planning

Before

1

Deeper data on mobile

Guided Depth

2

Graphs not hidden in hierarchy

Guided Depth

3

One-click access to all details

Actionable Insights

4

Broader data upfront (mobile)

Early Value

5

Broader data upfront (web)

Early Value

After

4

Broader data upfront (mobile)

Early Value

5

Broader data upfront (web)

Early Value

3

One-click access to all details

Actionable Insights

2

Graphs not hidden in hierarchy

Guided Depth

1

Deeper data on mobile

Guided Depth

Delivery begins

Data → signals

Raw pipeline logic was not usable at the decision layer

Guided Depth

Load & latency

Large datasets and graph loads created response delays

Guided Depth

Mobile app

In-field use required offline support

Early Value

Cross-tool impact

Affected downstream tools and flows

User education & content

Marketing material and analytics set-up.

Data science constraints

Multiple limitations across data science models.

Actionable Insights

Design system

Changes had to work within existing cross-team patterns

Guided Depth

Web workflows

Needed to support both expert depth and new-user entry

Early Value

V3 wasn’t a screen change. It was a system-level shift.

+ Those system implications shaped how every decision was made

Craft & execution

  1. Separated core actions from deeper controls in the top bar.

Early Value

  1. Introduced custom columns to surface critical data upfront.

Early Value

  1. Reduced multi-step navigation to one-click depth.

Guided Depth

  1. Prioritized signal over volume to reduce scrolling.

Actionable Insights

From dense monitoring to structured decision-making.

+ Each change required deeper architectural decisions.

View the decision breakdown

Before

After

  1. Top Bar

Visually

Improved hierarchy with clear separation of primary and secondary actions.


Collaboration & Influence

Top Bar - Global component used across 8 product teams.

Required cross-team alignment through a political process.

  1. Table

Visually

Surfaced decision-making data upfront.
Users can customize columns based on relevance.


Research

User testing validated the exact column content and prioritization.


Engineering

Designed with code awareness to scale across breakpoints with minimal rework.

Early Value

Guided Depth

Actionable Insights

+ The real proof came after release.

See how it shipped

We shipped what we could, and learned from what we couldn’t.

Some bets shipped early. Others were delayed or dropped.

We tracked what happened through:

  1. First-session engagement rate (new users)

  2. Mobile session duration (first-time users)

  3. Early-session drop-off rate

Post-release interviews with users and metric reviews with leadership and commercial.

+ Then we watched what changed.

What held up

Development starts (2 months)

Custom Columns (Table) - Shipped

Built quickly by leveraging existing infrastructure, enabling early value.

4

Broader data upfront (mobile)

Early Value

5

Broader data upfront (web)

Early Value

Unified View - Planned, Not Shipped

Why this wasn’t shipped is covered at the end.

3

One-click access to all details

Actionable Insights

Top Bar - Deferred, Shipped Later

Delayed due to cross-team dependencies across 8 teams.

2

Graphs not hidden in hierarchy

Guided Depth

1

Deeper data on mobile

Guided Depth

Delivery begins

Internal Beta (2 weeks) → Regional Rollout (15% traffic) → Full Deployment

Adoption shifted. Behavior changed.

Measured against first-session behavior and trust signals defined pre-launch.

+27% improvement in first-session engagement rate (new users).

Early drop-off reduced within the first interaction window.

+24% increase in repeat interaction within the same session.

Users returned to comparison elements after initial interaction.

+ Impact revealed gains. It also revealed gaps.

What went wrong

Where I Added Leverage

Suite-Wide Influence

Unified top-bar/navigation pattern scaled across 8 product teams and an additional software vertical.

Cross-Functional Alignment

Led structured PM / Eng / Data sync cadence across the project lifecycle.

Integrated data science model signals into UI decision logic.

Collaborated on frontend refactors to improve load efficiency.

Adoption & Strategy Influence

Introduced analytics dashboard to influence roadmap decisions.

Equipped commercial teams to clearly position the new product.

Team & Craft Leadership

Mentored junior designer; raised the quality bar across shared deliverables.

Reduced dev rework by formalizing top bar pattern within the design system.

Cultural Shift

Made performance part of design, not just engineering.

Replaced opinion-driven debates with side-by-side tradeoffs.

What we shipped worked - but not in the way we expected.

Custom columns drove strong engagement - not just for new users.

We expected depth to drive value for expert users.
They chose scannability instead.

Once key signals were visible upfront, deeper unified views lost urgency.

How usage reshaped the roadmap

Unified View - Deferred

Usage patterns showed limited need for deeper, unified views.

Custom Columns - Next Steps

High adoption revealed users preferred scannable data, staying within the table rather than going deeper.

I ran discovery sessions with users and found strong interest in preset column configurations.

This led to the concept of Views - preconfigured column setups tailored to geography.